Too many liberals have tried to suppress debate about Sweden’s violence problem.
Peaceful, comfortable, and broadly middle-class, Sweden’s reputation as a Scandi social-democratic paradise has been one of modern life’s reliable constants.
But this image is starting to crumble. Rocked by a migrant rape crisis, a wave of women’s killings, and a sharp rise in gun and grenade attacks, Sweden is struggling to reconcile its gentle outlook with this violent reckoning.
The tragedies took off after 2015, when Sweden was one of many European nations to respond to the continent’s worst migrant crisis since the Second World War. Its refugee numbers spiralled into six figures.
But merely raising questions about the effects of Sweden’s characteristically uber-liberal response to the 2015 migrant crisis attracted flurries of slurs from that reliable vortex of rage: journalists, academics and Twitter personalities.
Their ‘hurl abuse and ask questions later’ strategy was all the more enhanced by Donald Trump’s involvement in the discussion about Sweden – he regularly lambasted Stockholm’s open-arms approach to the Syrian civil war.
But left-wing media outlets and commentators have enforced a cult of silence on these crimes because they don’t match the vision they have concocted. Gun and grenade attacks are bad, but they are not as problematic as calling into question liberal propositions.
....
The strategy appears to be thus: accept a sudden influx of a ginormous group of people from a different culture to your own, fail to assimilate the new groups and allow negative behaviours to grow and be tolerated, and then suppress or ignore news about the violent and delinquent outcomes of these plans.
The uncomfortable truth about Sweden - spiked (spiked-online.com)
Именно так. Фордизм на третьем этапе не может продолжать надувание пузыря иным образом.
Последствия кстати могут быть разнообразны и не ограничиваться простыми жестокими изнасилованиями (весьма отличными от излюбленных в фордизме-3 sexual harrassment cases), бросанием гранат, поноживщиной или битьем стекол.
Отнюдь!
Есть последствия куда более серьёзные, и о них будет речь в последующих выпусках серии. Пойдет речь и о "исторической неизбежности" происходящего как это любит формулировать классический марксизм и гегельянство вообще. Неизбежна ли эта неизбежность? Попробуем поразмыслить и над этим трудным вопросом.