August 23rd, 2017

приятно поддамши

(no subject)

Джорджа Сороса, благодетеля нашего, сдали на съедение неблагодарным массам.

In perhaps the biggest political scandal since WikiLeaks, a group of hackers has dumped hundreds of files exposing the influence of socialist billionaire George Soros on Western politics.

The files show Soros has established a transnational network that pressures governments to adopt high immigration targets and porous border policies that could pose a challenge to legitimate state sovereignty. His Open Society Foundations target individuals who criticise ­Islamism and seek to influence the outcome of national elections by undermining Right-leaning politicians. The Australian arm of the Soros network is GetUp!.

GetUp! was established by ­activists Jeremy Heimans and David Madden with funding from Soros. The Labor-affiliated Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union donated $1.1 million to the group. Bill Shorten and John Hewson are former board members. A major funder listed on its 2014-15 Australian Electoral Commission expenditure return is Avaaz, the US GetUp! ­affiliate that has received copious amounts of funding from Soros networks.

Like most NGOs, GetUp! claims to be independent from political parties. Like many NGOs, however, it has close ties to the Left. As Sharri Markson ­revealed in this paper, GetUp! chairwoman Sarah Maddison urged people to vote for the Greens in the past federal election.

Всплыло видимо в связи с этим выступлением нашего премьера:

Наши консерваторы не желают состязаться с ним в риторике, но желают избавиться от этого мудака по-тихому, кулуарно, никого не смущая. Вряд ли!
приятно поддамши

(no subject)

Недурно формулирует

…in March 2013, dissident right blogger ‘Spandrell’ put up a short post on his abrasive but consistently brilliant Bloody Shovel site that messed up the narrative in a way that has yet to be persuasively addressed. Entitled ‘Et tu, Harry?,’ it placed the Singapore miracle in a disconcerting context. Rather than harmonizing with neoreactionary celebrations of the city state’s unapologetically selective immigration policy, Spandrell asks:

How many bright Indians and bright Chinese are there, Harry? Surely they are not infinite. And what will they do in Singapore? Well, engage in the finance and marketing rat-race and depress their fertility to 0.78, wasting valuable genes just so your property prices don’t go down. Singapore is an IQ shredder.

The accusation is acute, and can be generalized. Modernity has a fertility problem. When elevated to the zenith of savage irony, the formulation runs: At the demographic level, modernity selects systematically against modern populations. The people it prefers, it consumes. Without gross exaggeration, this endogenous tendency can be seen as an existential risk to the modern world. It threatens to bring the entire global order crashing down around it.

In order to discuss this implicit catastrophe, it’s first necessary to talk about cities, which is a conversation that has already begun. To state the problem crudely, but with confidence: Cities are population sinks. Historian William McNeil explains the basics. Urbanization, from its origins, has tended relentlessly to convert children from productive assets into objects of luxury consumption. All of the archaic economic incentives related to fertility are inverted.

и далее

“Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?” asked Eric Kaufmann in a 2010 book with that name. A peculiar twist in the Darwinian inheritance had begun to bring the heritability of religious attitudes into prominence, and linking it (positively) to the question of reproductive fitness. Those groups previously seen as having been unambiguously vanquished by a triumphant evolutionary science were now subject to an ironic – and from the progressive perspective deeply sinister – evolutionary vindication. This is a story that has still scarcely begun to unfold.

A parallel development, compounding the commitment of cultural modernity to imperative sterility, has been the efflorescence of LGBTQXYZ sexual identity politics. Following the decisive progressive victory in the cause of gay marriage, something like a Cambrian Explosion in non-traditional sexual and gender orientations has occurred, turbo-charging the pre-existing feminist critique of normative reproductive sexuality. Here, too, the affinity with profound modernistic inclinations is unmistakable, in a process of introjected brand and niche specialization. The tendency – often supported as an explicit political strategy – is to invert the terms of marginalization, by drowning the reproductive family unit within a hyper-inflated menu of socio-libidinal positions. Fertility is increasingly identified as a conservative eccentricity, legitimately targeted by partisan political warfare. Intense backlash has been among the results (providing fertile ground for the post-conciliatory ‘far right’).

приятно поддамши

(no subject)

В связи со скандалами вокруг разнообразных памятников Белой Цивилизации, а также и скандалами вокруг чадры / бурки в нашем парламенте и в уголовной хронике.

Гениальная идея.

Все памятники должны ставиться, одетые в чадру.

Во-первых, это красиво.

Во-вторых, загадочно.

Каждый может подойти и заглянуть под чадру памятнику. И что увидит сей любопытный человек?


Вот тут-то технология должна оказаться на высоте. Пока любопытный задирает чадру памятнику, его должна распознать камера слежения. Распознанное лицо анализируется за доли секунды - собирается полная картотека на этого гражданина, через Гугль всемогущий.

Что он любит, что не любит, каковы его друзья-приятели, что он ест и с кем спит.

И вот вычислив все желания этого гражданина, ему - под чадрой - показывают именно то, о чем он мечтает.

Одному покажут очаровательную женщину, а другому наоборот, вождя пролетариата Владимира Ильича. А третьему вообще ничего такого показывать нельзя, потому что он правоверный мусульманин. Ну само собой, в таких случаях показывается Коран и стрелка, указывающая направление на Мекку.

Вы спросите - а как быть, если любопытных больше одного? А тут и совсем просто, поскольку психология группы намного проще индивидуальной, и тем проще, чем гуще толпа. Любой профессиональный гипнотизер или политик-манипулятор макиавеллианского типа объяснит вам на пальцах ,что в таких случаях надо делать.

Таким образом на земле настанет полный мир, он же всеобщий и окончательный.