http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jan/31/terrorism-spectacle-how-states-respond-yuval-noah-harari-sapiens?CMP=share_btn_tw
Отличная статья о терроризме. Грубо говоря, терроризм постольку успешен, поскольку успешен государственный аппарат западного образца, монополизирующий насилие и устраняющий акты политического насилия с внутренней арены. Диспропорциональный ответ раздувшегося госаппарата насилия на теракты, существенно меняющий политический ландшафт - это и есть очевидный успех теракта, а не несколько жертв, которые ничего существенного в масштабах страны не меняют.
Аналогия - если чересчур тщательно соблюдать санитарию, иммунитет к самым пустячным болезням слабеет, и вдобавок развиваются аллергии.
The state has stressed so many times that it will not tolerate political violence within its borders that it has no alternative but to see any act of terrorism as intolerable. The citizens, for their part, have become used to zero political violence, so the theatre of terror incites in them visceral fears of anarchy, making them feel as if the social order is about to collapse. After centuries of bloody struggles, we have crawled out of the black hole of violence, but we feel that the black hole is still there, patiently waiting to swallow us again. A few gruesome atrocities and we imagine that we are falling back in.
In order to assuage these fears, the state is driven to respond with its own theatre of security. The most efficient answer to terrorism might be good intelligence and clandestine action against the networks of money that feed terrorism. But this is not something citizens can see on television. Once its citizens have seen the terrorist drama of the World Trade Center collapsing, the state feels compelled to stage an equally spectacular counterdrama, with even more fire and smoke. So instead of acting quietly and efficiently, it unleashes a mighty storm, which fulfils the terrorists’ most cherished dreams.